https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824156 --- Comment #27 from Simone Caronni <negativo17@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Eric Sandeen from comment #25) > If upstream is not building shared libraries or providing a stable API, > Fedora should not try to do on its own. Sound reasonable. Thanks. Version 1.0.3 with no more libraries and license file in the main package. Spec URL: https://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/exfatprogs.spec SRPM URL: https://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/exfatprogs-1.0.3-1.fc32.src.rpm $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-32-x86_64/result/exfatprogs-1.0.3-1.fc32.* exfatprogs.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Userspace -> User space, User-space, Users pace exfatprogs.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) exFAT -> ex Fat, expat, ex-fat exfatprogs.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US exFAT -> ex Fat, expat, ex-fat exfatprogs.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Userspace -> User space, User-space, Users pace exfatprogs.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) exFAT -> ex Fat, expat, ex-fat exfatprogs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US exFAT -> ex Fat, expat, ex-fat 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. Now let's wait for the FE-LEGAL waiver. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
