https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837107 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dominik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #1 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- BuildRequires: gcc-c++ BuildRequires: SDL2-devel, SDL2_net-devel BuildRequires: enet-devel BuildRequires: openal-soft-devel, autoconf BuildRequires: gettext-devel BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils BuildRequires: ImageMagick BuildRequires: libcurl-devel BuildRequires: automake It is a matter of taste, but I'd put one dependency per line and sort alphabetically. It's easier to follow and makes diffs smaller in case of dependency changes. %postun music if [ $1 -eq 0 ] ; then ## When Uninstall rm -fr %{prj_music_dir} fi This is unnecessary (and rpmlint warns about it being dangerous). You can get the list of files that autodownloader will download and include it with %ghost marker instead. cd /tmp/%{name}-music tar xjvf /tmp/%{name}-music/%{name}-music.tar.bz2 sudo install -v -m 644 /tmp/%{name}-music/%{name}-music/music/* %{_datadir}/%{name}/music sudo install -v -m 644 /tmp/%{name}-music/%{name}-music/*.txt %{_docdir}/%{name}-music This should use mktemp instead of a hard-coded directory name. Moreover, /tmp is an in-memory file system and may not have enough space. mktemp -p /var/tmp -d looks like a good solution here. Also, you should not assume that sudo will be configured. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx