https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834947 --- Comment #2 from Artur Iwicki <fedora@xxxxxxxxxx> --- >Just one question, was there a reason to modify auto-generated spec except of the %license/%doc and some description? Not really. I guess after writing most specs by hand, personal preferences got all tingly when confronted with the auto-generated one. >> License: GPLv3 >I think it should be rather GPLv3+, but I am not sure. Can you clarify it with upstream? Asked upstream, they confirmed it to be GPLv3-or-later: https://github.com/SoptikHa2/desed/issues/16 >Other than that, it seems Requires: sed is missing. D'oh! You're right, having sed installed would be quite useful for this package. spec: https://svgames.pl/fedora/rust-desed-1.1.4-2/rust-desed.spec srpm: https://svgames.pl/fedora/rust-desed-1.1.4-2/rust-desed-1.1.4-2.fc32.src.rpm koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=44501146 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
