https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832623 Michel Alexandre Salim <michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|stuart@xxxxxxxxxxx |michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #16 from Michel Alexandre Salim <michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Stuart D Gathman from comment #12) > In Fedora 31: > > $ rpm -ql fedora-release-common | grep user-preset > /usr/lib/systemd/user-preset > /usr/lib/systemd/user-preset/90-default-user.preset > > In Fedora 32: > > $ rpm -ql fedora-release-common | grep user-preset > /usr/lib/systemd/user-preset > /usr/lib/systemd/user-preset/90-default-user.preset > /usr/lib/systemd/user-preset/99-default-disable.preset > > That is why it was enabled by default on F31. So it won't be a problem > going forward. Oh, good to know. I'll gate it to Fedora 32 and above before committing then. Thanks for checking! I wrote this the day after I upgraded my last F31 machine, of course, heh. No need to close the bug, I'll assign it back to myself and link it to the package being pushed so Bodhi will close this when it hits stable. Thanks so much! (also since somebody sniped the package you wanted reviewed, feel free to ask for a review next time) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
