https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830310 --- Comment #4 from Robert Fairley <rfairley@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Dusty Mabe from comment #3) > > Package Review > > ============== > > > Legend: > > [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated > > [ ] = Manual review needed > > > > Issues: > > ======= > > - Package installs properly. > > Note: Installation errors (see attachment) > > See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ > > Can't install: > > Error: > Problem 1: conflicting requests > - nothing provides (crate(readwrite/default) >= 0.1.1 with > crate(readwrite/default) < 0.2.0) needed by > rust-pipe+bidirectional-devel-0.2.0-1.fc33.noarch > Problem 2: conflicting requests > - nothing provides (crate(readwrite/default) >= 0.1.1 with > crate(readwrite/default) < 0.2.0) needed by > rust-pipe+readwrite-devel-0.2.0-1.fc33.noarch > Now opened: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1831106 With `rust-readwrite` installed, these two features requiring `readwrite` now install successfully. > > - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) > > in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) > > for the package is included in %license. > > Note: License file COPYING is not marked as %license > > See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- > > guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text > > Let's add a `%license` pointing at the COPYING file. > +1 - `%license COPYING` is now added to the specfile. > > Rpmlint > > ------- > > Checking: rust-pipe-devel-0.2.0-1.fc33.noarch.rpm > > rust-pipe+default-devel-0.2.0-1.fc33.noarch.rpm > > rust-pipe+bidirectional-devel-0.2.0-1.fc33.noarch.rpm > > rust-pipe+readwrite-devel-0.2.0-1.fc33.noarch.rpm > > rust-pipe+unstable-doc-cfg-devel-0.2.0-1.fc33.noarch.rpm > > rust-pipe-0.2.0-1.fc33.src.rpm > > rust-pipe-devel.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://crates.io/crates/pipe HTTP Error 404: Not Found > > rust-pipe-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/cargo/registry/pipe-0.2.0/.cargo-checksum.json > > rust-pipe+default-devel.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://crates.io/crates/pipe HTTP Error 404: Not Found > > rust-pipe+default-devel.noarch: W: no-documentation > > rust-pipe+bidirectional-devel.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://crates.io/crates/pipe HTTP Error 404: Not Found > > rust-pipe+bidirectional-devel.noarch: W: no-documentation > > rust-pipe+readwrite-devel.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US readwrite -> read write, read-write, rewrite > > rust-pipe+readwrite-devel.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://crates.io/crates/pipe HTTP Error 404: Not Found > > rust-pipe+readwrite-devel.noarch: W: no-documentation > > rust-pipe+unstable-doc-cfg-devel.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://crates.io/crates/pipe HTTP Error 404: Not Found > > rust-pipe+unstable-doc-cfg-devel.noarch: W: no-documentation > > rust-pipe.src: W: invalid-url URL: https://crates.io/crates/pipe HTTP Error 404: Not Found > > 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 12 warnings. > > I'm not sure why it's saying https://crates.io/crates/pipe is an invalid URL > because it's working for me. > I would ingnore the no-documentation warning. > I wonder if we can do something about the hidden-file-or-dir warning. The hidden-file-or-dir warning seems to come up when using the default macros - I think this could be addressed in https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-srpm-macros (maybe to avoid packaging the file altogether as it seems to apply only to vendored rust deps, or exclude it from the hidden-file-or-dir check). Will take a look into this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
