Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-rpm - Ruby bindings for RPM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317581 dlutter@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |MODIFIED Flag|needinfo?(dlutter@xxxxxxxxxx| |) | ------- Additional Comments From dlutter@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-10-19 18:51 EST ------- I have addressed the first two issues. Spec: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/spec/ruby-rpm.spec SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/ruby-rpm-1.2.3-3.src.rpm > Well, for 1.2.3-2: > > * File dependency > ----------------------------------------------------- > BuildRequires: /usr/include/popt.h > ----------------------------------------------------- Fixed. > * SourceURL > - It seems that "20469" should be "26403" > - However > http://rubyforge.org/frs/download.php/26403/ruby-rpm-1.2.3.tgz > seems different from the tarball in your srpm? > ! Well, for rubyforge.org, the number like "26403" > seems to change every time new version is released. Yeah, rubyforge has this annoying habit of inserting a random number into the URL. Fixed. > * Encoding > ----------------------------------------------------- > Forgot to mention: the only warning I get from rpmlint is > W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/ruby-rpm-1.2.3/doc/refm.rd.ja > > Any idea what encoding that file is ? (I don't know any Japanese, so I won't > know if I recoded anything right) > ----------------------------------------------------- > - This file is encoded in EUC-JP (well, I am a Japanese) > (Many Japanese documents in *nix are encoded in EUC-JP or > ISO-2022-JP, and many Japanese documents in M$ are encoded > in SHIFT-JIS). recode EUC-JP..UTF-8 refused to work on this file. For now, it's unchanged. not sure if it's readable for a Japanese reader. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review