https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823599 --- Comment #19 from Alexander Ploumistos <alex.ploumistos@xxxxxxxxx> --- Hello Bob, Good job with all the changes! (In reply to Bob Hepple from comment #16) > Alexander - I can't replicate your block icon problem on my system. Do you > have anything in your ~/.gjotsfile ?? What is your locale? Mine is > LC_ALL=en_AU.utf8 and LANG=C. I don't have LANG defined, but everything else is en_US.UTF-8 and the .gjotsfile was empty. In the meantime I've moved to Fedora 32 and with your latest changes, I didn't get these blocks, so we can chalk it off as gremlins I guess. When I tried to launch gjots2 in F32 I noticed that I was getting the generic executable icon and not the png in /usr/share/pixmaps. In the desktop file you have "Icon=gjots2", but the file is called gjots.png. According to the specification, it shouldn't have worked before and I don't know why it did, but you should rename the image to gjots2.png. When I renamed the file I did get the right icon. My bad, I didn't think twice about that when I saw it before. By the way, with HiDPI/4K displays becoming commonplace (I still don't have one) graphics are growing huge these days. If you ever need any help creating a higher resolution icon, I'm sure that you can ask on the design team's mailing list and someone should be able to help you - there are a lot of talented people working on Fedora. Just add the trailing slash, rename the icon file and we're good to go. Thanks again Miro! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
