https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803059 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- Right, not font packages build on rawhide right now, because it has emerged rpm 4.15 stealthily changed Source/Patches evaluation rules, making existing templates unsafe. The fix is coded by it is waiting for the common part to be merged in redhat-rpm-config. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/83#comment-42999 Sadly no one wanted to look at the problem seriously rpm or redhat-rpm-config side before I pushed a macro build to koji that showed things were not so simple. *After* breaking rawhide builds people had to look at it and it has emerged it is possible to evade the rpm change consequences by using %sourcelist and %patchlist, and adding a wrapper around Name:/%package to workaround the fact %{name} is "special". You have an example of the new templates and of converted packages in https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nim/workaround-rpm-commit-93604e2-effects/builds/ I did everything I could to adapt the macro code to rpm changes with as little spec changes as possible. (you can not use those before the common part is merged in redhat-rpm-config) @eclipseo: Go specs will need the same kind of adjustment, because they use the same basic spec structure, I'm waiting to get the fonts part done to be sure there is no problem left before moving to the Go part. @peter So, it will mostly be transparent font spec side, except Sources will move to a new rpm section and you will lose the ability to set the index of a fontconfig file in sources. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
