Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331631 wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo? ------- Additional Comments From wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-10-19 15:52 EST ------- http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/mknbi-1.4.4-5.fc8.src.rpm * Fri Oct 19 2007 Warren Togami <wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx> 1.4.4-5 - Not noarch - Fix build and make ExclusiveArch: i386 x86_64 - more cleanups This builds i386 binaries within the x86_64 package, similar to how we package memtest86+. noarch was not a good choice for this package because it clearly contained architecture specific bytecode, and wouldn't run at all on PPC for example. rpmlint mknbi-1.4.4-5.fc8.i386.rpm mknbi.i386: E: no-binary mknbi.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib No idea what these errors are about. Any ideas? [builder1@newcaprica SRPMS]$ rpmlint mknbi-1.4.4-5.fc8.src.rpm mknbi.src:30: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build make BUILD_ROOT="$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" PREFIX=%{_prefix} Not harmful... mknbi.src:43: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/mknbi/ This is necessary due to i386 binaries in the x86_64 package. Any objections to approving this? Any other suggestions for improvement? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review