https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824156 --- Comment #9 from Simone Caronni <negativo17@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #4) > (In reply to Simone Caronni from comment #2) > > I've set the Epoch to 1 and obsoleted the fuse implementation, so it > > correctly obsoletes both exfat-utils and fuse-exfat that are shipped in > > RPMFusion. > > I'm very confused why an Epoch is needed. Also, why obsolete+provide the > FUSE implementation? This does not provide the ability to use exfat in FUSE. Hi, thanks for the review. The exfat-utils in RPMFusion had the same name but with version 1.3.1, so an Epoch was for sure needed. The Fuse implementation was a "workaround" for a missing kernel implementation, so in my idea this would replace the fuse based installation on the user system. But now that the package has been renamed we can drop this entirely as they can coexist. Not sure of the benefit though, I think it will create more confusion than anything. Spec URL: https://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/exfatprogs.spec SRPM URL: https://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/exfatprogs-1.0.1-2.fc32.src.rpm - Rename to exfatprogs. - Removed provides/obsoletes on Fuse implementation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
