[Bug 1824016] Review Request: neatvnc - a liberally licensed VNC server library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824016



--- Comment #3 from Aleksei Bavshin <alebastr89@xxxxxxxxx> ---
> License:  ISC and MIT and Unlicensed and BSD
> # miniz is unlicensed: http://unlicense.org

Unlicensed -> Unlicense.
Would be even better to write a detailed distribution of licenses, i.e.
something like this:

# main source is ISC
# include/sys/queue.h is BSD
# bundled miniz is MIT and Unlicense
License:  ISC and BSD and MIT and Unlicense

Otherwise I don't see any issues. Package builds in mock, wayvnc works,
requires/provides are good and rpmlint's only significant complaint is about
invalid license (Unlicensed). Full output of fedora-review is long, boring and
has nothing of note. Thanks for all the work on the package!

I'd set both this and wayvnc as approved, but apparently a faulty script did
not grant me reviewer permissions in bugzilla and I cannot take the bug or set
fedora-review+. I already pinged infra team and they'll fix that sooner or
later. Meanwhile... maybe someone could step in and finish the review.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux