https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823265 Till Hofmann <thofmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thofmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #6 from Till Hofmann <thofmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Aleksei Bavshin from comment #4) > > Also, technically that makes package not installable on Fedora < 32 without > sway module. It's safe to ignore f30 (EOL by the end of May) and epel8 (does > not even have sway modular builds), but f31 is still supported for a while. > However if we allow installation with older sway it would only serve as a > source of confusion and bug reports. > I admit that I don't know a good solution for that besides outright ignoring > f31. That's a perfectly valid solution. New packages don't have to be shipped with all active releases. We can still include the package in the module. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
