https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805928 --- Comment #13 from Artem <ego.cordatus@xxxxxxxxx> --- > Uh ... that's my point, it's *not* an elementary project. Seems like we have some misunderstanding there, but that's obviously since you asking meta questions. So what's exactly a problem here? You still didn't said. What is a real fix for this specifically case since there already 'planner' package exist in Fedora? And why you asking like i did something criminal since *you* as person who responsible for Elementary stack didn't wrote any guidelines for it? > Fair enough, but the packaging Guidelines still specify that you should document *why* you're modifying build flags. In case with LTO this is obvious why and as you already seen other maintainers not specify too why they build with LTO. But sometimes i document even how much profit we got there in percentage ratio, see [1]. So i am not "arbitrarily" building with -flto, as you stated. > The Change about enabling LTO by default also has no bearing on this, because it would change the *default* build flags, and thereby *by definiton* moving the goalpost for everybody. One again, since you asking meta question i have no idea what has bearing on this and what doesn't for you. And you quoting wrong thesis. Thesis was why i enabling LTO in *some* my package. Answer was for the same reason that mozjs did and for the same reason why it was proposed to enable it by default in F32. And i asked many times other maintainers about LTO specifically and there is nothing wrong with that. [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kakoune/blob/master/f/kakoune.spec#_3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
