Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From eharrison@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-10-17 20:17 EST ------- (in reply to comment #31) At least iptables-ltsp (until an alternative is implemented) and ltsp-dhcpd need to be started by default if the server is configured to boot thin clients. I'll contact the iptables maintainer usr/share/ltsp5/config/ltsp-dhcpd.conf fixed. I changed ltsp-dhcpd-create to cat because I was going to make it a template and run it through sed (i.e. cat ltsp-dhcpd.conf.template | sed s/IP/$IP/ > /etc/ltsp-dhcpd.conf), but got side-tracked fixing other bugs. I added an empty file in etc/ltsp-dhcpd.conf because %{ghost} & friends were complaining that the file did not exist. I need to read up on the docs on that one, I'm obviously doing something wrong. /tftpboot/ltps5/pxe fixed. tftpd chroots into /tftpboot/, a symlink will not work. Jim McQuillian @ LTSP contacted the LSB long ago asking for assistance on where to place the ltsp root. They settled on /opt/. I just checked and both Ubuntu and Debian are currently using /opt/ for their ltsp5 implementations. I didn't see where they are putting the swap files. I'll get to that shortly. That said, I'm not particularly attached to /opt/, but it is nice to be consistent with everyone else. I just pushed out an update with a bunch of scripting fixes. I'll push out all of the above changes here shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review