https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820391 --- Comment #4 from Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Andreas Gerstmayr from comment #3) > (In reply to Nathan Scott from comment #2) > > That is the latest release with a non-open-source license. :( > > Hmm, that's quite unfortunate - so we'll be stuck on an outdated version > forever if no volunteers are working on the open source fork :/ Indeed. Fortunately it was a fairly mature version they forked from, with good automated testing in place, and the sorts of features they're now adding have tended to be scaling (clustering) related - not super important for our immediate needs (and those of many other folk). It is what it is. > > [!]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag > > Note: Could not download Source0: > > https://github.com/GoodFORM/RediSearch/archive/1.2.2/RediSearch-1.2.2.tar.gz > > See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- > > guidelines/SourceURL/ > > The git tag is prefixed with "v", which is missing in the URL. Ah - thanks, fixed. > > Unversioned so-files > > -------------------- > > RediSearch: /usr/lib64/redis/modules/redisearch.so > > I guess this is not a problem, as no other binary is linking to it and redis Yep, and its not visible to ldconfig in the Fedora location (so no ldd search path will 'accidentally' find it) > Package approved when the URL issue is fixed. Thanks for the review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
