https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805779 --- Comment #11 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> --- Apologies that this created some work for you, Adam. There was few thoughts going in my mind when I approved this package review without mandating Provides: tag but I clearly missed further steps required for this package. These thoughts were like adapting to new fonts packaging in Fedora, packages getting renamed due to that in Fedora, RHEL N+1 upgrade path, keeping "Obsoletes: and Provides:" tag for many years and then is no way to auto cross-check these old "Obsoletes: and Provides:" tag in existing spec files. I understand its package maintainer responsibility to add and remove "Obsoletes: and Provides:" tag when time comes. There are few more font packages now in queue that are ready to get renamed in Fedora when they will adapt to new fonts packaging guidelines. While I missed that point about clean upgrade path for this package. I did remember it for my other packages, hence my work on converting existing packages to new guidelines is stalled currently. I have got one rename review (google-carlito-fonts) approved since few days but have not built it in Fedora yet as it also involves changing package name to all those places. But now I am going to build it today. About querying package dependencies, I am surprised why Fedora users are not affected by this dnf bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812596 which should have been fixed on urgent basis. It is present in at least F31 and F32 releases. This is causing me issues to understand package dependency chain. Its good that RHEL-8 is not poisoned by introducing new dnf updates yet. So, I am using it to understand probable dependency chain in Fedora. It is good that failed-composes repository is helping releng to quickly find such issues but I understand is costs one more complete compose to have reported issues fixed. I will make sure to check for further steps taken on such rename request packages in my future package review work. Thank you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
