https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812855 Remi Collet <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(fedora@famillecol | |let.com) | --- Comment #8 from Remi Collet <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Perhaps, I'm the only one, but I really think the "default" license in FPCA is a mess, and that we need to have explicit license on all spec file. When I start adding a License headers on all my spec files, I raise the question on "legal", and the answer was that this is ok. I now have hundreds of spec files using this license, and don't plan to change this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
