https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812294 Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |POST CC| |zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> --- - Are you sure these executable scripts should be marked as config(noreplace)? wicked.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/wicked/extensions/dispatch wicked.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/wicked/extensions/firewall wicked.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/wicked/extensions/hostname wicked.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/wicked/extensions/ibft wicked.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/wicked/extensions/netconfig Package is approved otherwise. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU Lesser General Public License", "GPL (v2 or later)", "GPL (v2)", "Public domain GPL (v2 or later) GNU Lesser General Public License", "*No copyright* GPL (v2 or later)", "GPL (v2) (with incorrect FSF address)". 437 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/wicked/review-wicked/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified. Note: No (noreplace) in %config /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.opensuse.Network.conf %config /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.opensuse.Network.AUTO4.conf %config /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.opensuse.Network.DHCP4.conf %config /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.opensuse.Network.DHCP6.conf %config /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.opensuse.Network.Nanny.conf [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 112640 bytes in 63 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: No %config files under /usr. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: systemd_post is invoked in %post, systemd_preun in %preun, and systemd_postun in %postun for Systemd service files. Note: Systemd service file(s) in wicked [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in libwicked [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros Note: Some obsoleted macros found, see the attachment. See: https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/wiki/AutoTools [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: wicked-0.6.63-1.fc33.x86_64.rpm wicked-devel-0.6.63-1.fc33.x86_64.rpm libwicked-0.6.63-1.fc33.x86_64.rpm wicked-debuginfo-0.6.63-1.fc33.x86_64.rpm wicked-debugsource-0.6.63-1.fc33.x86_64.rpm wicked-0.6.63-1.fc33.src.rpm wicked.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.opensuse.Network.AUTO4.conf wicked.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.opensuse.Network.DHCP4.conf wicked.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.opensuse.Network.DHCP6.conf wicked.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.opensuse.Network.Nanny.conf wicked.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.opensuse.Network.conf wicked.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/wicked/extensions/dispatch wicked.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/wicked/extensions/firewall wicked.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/wicked/extensions/hostname wicked.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/wicked/extensions/ibft wicked.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/wicked/extensions/netconfig wicked.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man8/wicked-ethtool.8.gz 11: warning: macro `b' not defined wicked.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man8/wicked-ethtool.8.gz 102: warning: macro `ni' not defined wicked.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/wicked 750 wicked.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary wickedd-nanny libwicked.x86_64: W: no-documentation wicked.src:74: W: configure-without-libdir-spec wicked.src:78: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 78) 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 11 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
