https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812855 Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo? --- Comment #7 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> --- > # License: CC-BY-SA > # http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ I'm not sure this is an okay license for spec files. Creative Commons discourages the usage of CC licenses for code. The FPCA already defaults spec files to be licensed MIT[1], can you license it as something that makes more sense for code? [1]: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:Fedora_Project_Contributor_Agreement -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
