https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797362 --- Comment #10 from Johan Vromans <jvromans@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks for the approval. I still have a question about this package being successor to the chordii package. I am also maintainer of the chordii program and package and I want to deprecate it. Should I just add Obsoletes:chordii to the chordpro spec file? Should I add Provides:chordii even though it is not a plug compatible replacement? It is a full functional replacement. AFAICS this would be consistent with the discussion https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/645 and the packaging guidelines. Apologies if this is not the right place to ask. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
