https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801580 --- Comment #22 from jiri vanek <jvanek@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Moreover yes. > I commit into package openjfx the code from this review (openjfx 11) in rawhide. In that moment I have to disable openjdk8 bindings. > In meantime I fix the FTBFS of the package openjfx (openjfx 8) in F32. Yes, unless you wish to have both openjfx-8 and openjfx(-11) in f32 In that case the FTBS failure can be solved during openjfx-8 review. But I doubt that :) We have to start in rawhide, and are unlikely to make it for f32. Probably the most correct way is to go as self-contained change for f33, to get a proper adudience on the topic. > I make a package review for a new openjfx8 package and I merge into the code for openjfx 8 and you drive the modifications needed for java-1.8.0-openjdk-openjfx yes -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
