https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760617 --- Comment #37 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Qianqian Fang from comment #36) > My preference is to get the package out first. Sure, but what I'm saying is that you do *not* have to build the package for all arches for the package to be approved. If upstream (you) do not support all arches, they can be excluded as per the guidelines: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_architecture_support : "If a Fedora package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture..." So, all you have to do is file the tracker bugs. Isn't that better than providing the package for all arches, but it working incorrectly on a few? It's totally your call. If this weren't a scientific tool where correctness is paramount, I wouldn't care so much either :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
