https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760617 --- Comment #35 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Qianqian Fang from comment #34) > thanks. it was not just arm, but all platforms other than i686 and x86_64. > see > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41672272 > > > so I did the following: > > 1. tweaked my Makefile so that it can compile on non ix86/x86_64 platforms > > 2. recreated a release, and updated the source file > > 3. updated the spec file using %ifarch > > after this update, I was able to compile on all platforms, see > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41698953 That looks good. > However I want to mention that the simulation results on other platforms are > not quite correct. I will leave this for further source code updates. For > packaging, I think this should be sufficient. If the simulation results aren't correct, do we want to provide mmc for these arches (I worry about the scenario where someone does use the tool on these arches and comes up with wrong scientific results)? Maybe excluding them would be the correct thing to do? That's perfectly OK as long as we follow the system and file bugs to record it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
