https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803302 --- Comment #4 from Joe Doss <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Omair Majid from comment #3) > Drive-by suggestion: Can you use SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH instead of $(date > +%Y-%m-%d)? That would make this build more reproducible. Thanks for this Omair. Updated my spec to use SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH. GitHub released 0.5.6 already with another dependency that has two other dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805482 is one of them. I am having trouble building the other which I emailed Robert-André off BZ to figure out how to handle/package. I will update this BZ with the updated spec and srpm once that is sorted out. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
