https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1791588 --- Comment #11 from Simone Caronni <negativo17@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Luya Tshimbalanga from comment #10) > More fixes to resolves: > > - Package must own all directories that it creates. > Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib64/vapoursynth Fixed. > - Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. > Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/doc/vapoursynth- > libs(locale,, defaulting, C, to, set, Failed), > /usr/share/licenses/vapoursynth-libs(locale,, defaulting, C, to, set, > Failed), /usr/lib64/python3.8/site-packages/VapourSynth-48-py3.8.egg- > info(locale,, defaulting, C, to, set, Failed), > /usr/include/vapoursynth(locale,, defaulting, C, to, set, Failed) This is not correct, there is no overlap here. I also think fedora-review is going bonkers ("locale,, defaulting, C, to, set, Failed"??). > - Use "autosetup -p1" for patches rather than "setup" or "setup -q" and > condition Patch1 for Fedora 32 I can not use autosetup as it would apply all patches regardless, so that's why I used setup. Anyway I changed to the better upstream Python 3.8 patch and I don't need a conditional anymore. > [!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. > Note: Mock build failed > See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- > guidelines/#_use_rpmlint $ rpmlint vapoursynth.spec vapoursynth*.rpm vapoursynth-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation vapoursynth-plugins.x86_64: W: no-documentation vapoursynth-tools.x86_64: W: no-documentation vapoursynth-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary vspipe 10 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. > [!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. > Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see > attached diff). > See: (this test has no URL) Don't know where this comes from, but it's the same. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx