https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801580 --- Comment #6 from jiri vanek <jvanek@xxxxxxxxxx> --- btw, there is openjfx package. Do yo mind to clarify the coexistence of those two? I guess openjfx is, and will rewamin for jdk8, where this openjfx-11 will be for jdk11...and up? In that moment the weuestion arise, how to deal with those. Will you rename the package with jdk14 and/or 17? Also I believe your package *is* working with anything we build under java-latest-openjdk, so you should require java >=11, but in that moment the name is wrong. To have it working flawlessly, we had this in openjdk8 for openjfx(8): https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=20202175 That is a binding subpackage (coantains only symlinks). Is something like that wortky for 11+? dnf install javafx Last metadata expiration check: 1:09:27 ago on Wed 19 Feb 2020 09:58:11 AM CET. Dependencies resolved. ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repo Size ================================================================================ Installing: java-1.8.0-openjdk-openjfx x86_64 1:1.8.0.242.b08-0.fc31 updates 34 k Installing dependencies: openjfx x86_64 8.0.202-8.b07.fc31 fedora 8.7 M Transaction Summary ================================================================================ Install 2 Packages Before review itself, we have to clarify the system integration. From this point of view, you step into a self-contianed change :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
