[Bug 1794971] Review Request: musescore - Music Composition & Notation Software

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1794971

Michel Alexandre Salim <michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
              Flags|                            |fedora-review+



--- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim <michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---

Looks mostly fine. APPROVED.

Would appreciate a swap with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804529 (but only if you have time)

Some nits:
- 3.4.2 is out, you can update when importing
- not sure where exactly the CC-BY files are contained. If they are indeed used
in the -doc subpackage, this file might need to be added to -doc's %license or
%doc (since technically it's not really a license but a license declaration for
some files): mscore/data/icons/LICENSE.md

Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======

===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[?]: Provides: bundled(gnulib) in place as required.
     Note: Sources not installed
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
     BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
     must be documented in the spec.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[?]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or
     desktop-file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro.
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[!]: Latest version is packaged.
     MuseScore 3.4.2 is released, please update
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
     justified.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: Mock build failed
     See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
     guidelines/#_use_rpmlint
[!]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.
     Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 71956480 bytes in /usr/share
     musescore-3.4.1-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm:71956480
     See:
    
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines#Package_Review_Guidelines
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Installation errors
-------------------
INFO: mock.py version 1.4.21 starting (python version = 3.7.6)...
Start: init plugins
INFO: selinux enabled
Finish: init plugins
INFO: Signal handler active
Start: run
Start: chroot init
INFO: calling preinit hooks
INFO: enabled root cache
INFO: enabled dnf cache
Start: cleaning dnf metadata
Finish: cleaning dnf metadata
INFO: enabled HW Info plugin
Mock Version: 1.4.21
INFO: Mock Version: 1.4.21
Finish: chroot init
INFO: installing package(s):
/home/michel/src/fedora/reviews/1794971-musescore/results/musescore-debugsource-3.4.1-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm
/home/michel/src/fedora/reviews/1794971-musescore/results/musescore-doc-3.4.1-1.fc31.noarch.rpm
/home/michel/src/fedora/reviews/1794971-musescore/results/musescore-3.4.1-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm
/home/michel/src/fedora/reviews/1794971-musescore/results/musescore-debuginfo-3.4.1-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/dnf --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-31-x86_64-musescore/root/
--releasever 31 --setopt=deltarpm=False --allowerasing --disableplugin=local
--disableplugin=spacewalk install
/home/michel/src/fedora/reviews/1794971-musescore/results/musescore-debugsource-3.4.1-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm
/home/michel/src/fedora/reviews/1794971-musescore/results/musescore-doc-3.4.1-1.fc31.noarch.rpm
/home/michel/src/fedora/reviews/1794971-musescore/results/musescore-3.4.1-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm
/home/michel/src/fedora/reviews/1794971-musescore/results/musescore-debuginfo-3.4.1-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm
--setopt=tsflags=nocontexts



Rpmlint
-------
Checking: musescore-3.4.1-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm
          musescore-doc-3.4.1-1.fc31.noarch.rpm
          musescore-debuginfo-3.4.1-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm
          musescore-debugsource-3.4.1-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm
          musescore-3.4.1-1.fc31.src.rpm
musescore.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/licenses/musescore/COPYING.LESSER.rtf2html
musescore.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/mscore-3.4/plugins/abc_import.qml
musescore.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/mscore-3.4/plugins/run.qml
musescore.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/mscore-3.4/styles/cchords_muse.xml
musescore.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/mscore-3.4/styles/cchords_nrb.xml
musescore.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/mscore-3.4/styles/cchords_rb.xml
musescore.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/mscore-3.4/styles/cchords_sym.xml
musescore.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/mscore-3.4/styles/chords.xml
musescore.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/mscore-3.4/styles/chords_jazz.xml
musescore.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/mscore-3.4/styles/chords_std.xml
musescore.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/mscore-3.4/styles/jazzchords.xml
musescore.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/mscore-3.4/styles/stdchords.xml
musescore.src:87: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(intervaltree)
musescore.src:274: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 13 errors, 1 warnings.




Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/musescore/MuseScore/releases/download/v3.4.1/MuseScore-3.4.1.zip
:
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     :
10f660af4fec77f9564a4c54c629d6314899a01b240ff5352b5ffb2fcb34ed21
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
10f660af4fec77f9564a4c54c629d6314899a01b240ff5352b5ffb2fcb34ed21


Requires
--------
musescore (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    gnu-free-sans-fonts
    gnu-free-serif-fonts
    hicolor-icon-theme
    libQt5Core.so.5()(64bit)
    libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit)
    libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5.13)(64bit)
    libQt5Gui.so.5()(64bit)
    libQt5Gui.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit)
    libQt5Help.so.5()(64bit)
    libQt5Help.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit)
    libQt5Network.so.5()(64bit)
    libQt5Network.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit)
    libQt5PrintSupport.so.5()(64bit)
    libQt5PrintSupport.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit)
    libQt5Qml.so.5()(64bit)
    libQt5Qml.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit)
    libQt5Quick.so.5()(64bit)
    libQt5Quick.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit)
    libQt5Solutions_SingleApplication-2.6.so.1()(64bit)
    libQt5Svg.so.5()(64bit)
    libQt5Svg.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit)
    libQt5WebEngineCore.so.5()(64bit)
    libQt5WebEngineCore.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit)
    libQt5WebEngineWidgets.so.5()(64bit)
    libQt5WebEngineWidgets.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit)
    libQt5Widgets.so.5()(64bit)
    libQt5Widgets.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit)
    libQt5Xml.so.5()(64bit)
    libQt5Xml.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit)
    libQt5XmlPatterns.so.5()(64bit)
    libQt5XmlPatterns.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit)
    libasound.so.2()(64bit)
    libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9)(64bit)
    libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9.0rc4)(64bit)
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libdl.so.2()(64bit)
    libfreetype.so.6()(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
    libm.so.6()(64bit)
    libpoppler-qt5.so.1()(64bit)
    libportaudio.so.2()(64bit)
    libportmidi.so.0()(64bit)
    libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
    libpulse.so.0()(64bit)
    libpulse.so.0(PULSE_0)(64bit)
    libsndfile.so.1()(64bit)
    libsndfile.so.1(libsndfile.so.1.0)(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.1)(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.8)(64bit)
    libvorbisfile.so.3()(64bit)
    libz.so.1()(64bit)
    musescore-fonts
    qt5-qtbase(x86-64)
    qt5-qtquickcontrols2(x86-64)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)
    soundfont2
    soundfont2-default
    steinberg-bravura-fonts
    steinberg-bravura-text-fonts

musescore-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    musescore

musescore-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):

musescore-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):



Provides
--------
musescore:
    application()
    application(mscore.desktop)
    bundled(beatroot-vamp)
    bundled(intervaltree)
    bundled(rtf2html)
    metainfo()
    metainfo(org.musescore.MuseScore.appdata.xml)
    mimehandler(application/vnd.recordare.musicxml)
    mimehandler(application/vnd.recordare.musicxml+xml)
    mimehandler(application/x-musescore)
    mimehandler(application/x-musescore+xml)
    mimehandler(application/xml)
    mimehandler(audio/midi)
    mimehandler(text/x-lilypond)
    mscore
    musescore
    musescore(x86-64)

musescore-doc:
    mscore-doc
    musescore-doc

musescore-debuginfo:
    debuginfo(build-id)
    musescore-debuginfo
    musescore-debuginfo(x86-64)

musescore-debugsource:
    musescore-debugsource
    musescore-debugsource(x86-64)



Generated by fedora-review 0.7.4 (54fa030) last change: 2019-12-07
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1794971 -m fedora-31-x86_64 -o
--uniqueext musescore
Buildroot used: fedora-31-x86_64
Active plugins: Shell-api, Generic, C/C++
Disabled plugins: R, Python, fonts, PHP, Java, Ocaml, Haskell, SugarActivity,
Perl
Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux