Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x3d-dtd-schema - X3D DTDs and schemata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251282 ------- Additional Comments From green@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-10-13 23:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > There are now, in addition to the 3.0 DTDs, 3.1 DTDs; and 3.2 DTDs are > forthcoming. The Web3D Consortium packages these separately. Should we compile > them into a single RPM package (i.e., "x3d-dtd-schemas"), or provide them in > separate packages (i.e., "x3d-dtd-schemas30", "x3d-dtd-schemas31", etc.)? (I should have read all your comments before responding!) I like the idea of putting them all in one package. > Another issue... While the Consortium fixes bugs in these DTDs in their revision > control, they do not appear to think it necessary to provide updated packages > with the fixes. My current strategy is to apply patches with the updates to the > packaged DTDs. Painful, but I don't have a better idea. That sounds fair to me. This kind of behaviour is quite common. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review