Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x3d-dtd-schema - X3D DTDs and schemata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251282 ------- Additional Comments From braden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-10-13 20:10 EST ------- Re: the rpmlint warnings, is it appropriate to process the files with dos2unix? Or is some other mechanism preferred? A bit more about additional DTD versions... There are now, in addition to the 3.0 DTDs, 3.1 DTDs; and 3.2 DTDs are forthcoming. The Web3D Consortium packages these separately. Should we compile them into a single RPM package (i.e., "x3d-dtd-schemas"), or provide them in separate packages (i.e., "x3d-dtd-schemas30", "x3d-dtd-schemas31", etc.)? Another issue... While the Consortium fixes bugs in these DTDs in their revision control, they do not appear to think it necessary to provide updated packages with the fixes. My current strategy is to apply patches with the updates to the packaged DTDs. Painful, but I don't have a better idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review