Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328771 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun@xxxxxxxxx 2007-10-13 08:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > What is exactly the use of > /usr/lib/babl-0.0/CIE-Lab.so > /usr/lib/babl-0.0/gegl-fixups.so > /usr/lib/babl-0.0/gggl-lies.so > /usr/lib/babl-0.0/gggl.so > /usr/lib/babl-0.0/naive-CMYK.so > You're correct, they are extension. I've put them in the main package. > They don't look like library to link against, but rather like > dlopened extensions. Is it the case? In that case they should be > in the main package, unless they are examples that shouldn't be > shipped. And since gggl stuff seems to be GPLv2+, the version > should be updated. I dont understand what you mean by the last sentence. Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/babl/bal.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/babl/babl-0.0.15-0.4.20071011svn.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review