https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790241 --- Comment #9 from Martin Jackson <mhjacks@xxxxxxxxxx> --- I tried exactly that. However: python3-adduserpath provides: % rpm -q --provides python3-adduserpath python-adduserpath = 0.4.0-7.fc31 python3-adduserpath = 0.4.0-7.fc31 python3.7dist(adduserpath) = 0.4 python3dist(adduserpath) = 0.4 Meanwhile pipx auto-requires the following: rovides: pipx = 0.15.1.3-1.fc31 python3.7dist(pipx) = 0.15.1.3 python3dist(pipx) = 0.15.1.3 Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PartialHardlinkSets) <= 4.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 Requires: /usr/bin/python3 python(abi) = 3.7 python3.7dist(argcomplete) >= 1.9.4 python3.7dist(argcomplete) < 2 python3.7dist(setuptools) python3.7dist(userpath) (And so python3-adduserpath does not satisfy the requirements on f31 without editing) And the autorequires for pipx are looking for just "userpath" (since that's the name of the module that the package provides. I believe that means that: 1) the forthcoming python3-userpath module (in f32) would need have to prrovide python3dist(adduserpath) and 2) python3-userpath would have to also obsolete python3-adduserpath. Even in that case, we may have to force pipx's dependency list, which seems to be awfully throwaway work that would just need to be undone in the next release. If there's a cleaner way to do it, I'm open to it; I'm new to some of the complexities of packaging; this certainly seems to be a bit of an edge case. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
