Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-10-12 02:51 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=225181) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=225181&action=view) Patch for libX11.so linkage fix For 0.6.0-1.5615ca * Undefined non-weak symbols - Still these symbols exist. ----------------------------------------------------- [root@localhost ~]# rpm -q libcompizconfig libcompizconfig-0.6.0-1.5615ca.fc8 [root@localhost ~]# rpmlint libcompizconfig libcompizconfig.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libcompizconfig.so.0.0.0 XStringToKeysym libcompizconfig.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libcompizconfig.so.0.0.0 XKeysymToString [root@localhost ~]# ldd -r /usr/lib/libcompizconfig.so.0.0.0 >/dev/null undefined symbol: XStringToKeysym (/usr/lib/libcompizconfig.so.0.0.0) undefined symbol: XKeysymToString (/usr/lib/libcompizconfig.so.0.0.0) ----------------------------------------------------- Only installing libX11-devel will not solve this issue. You have to patch against Makefile.in so that libcompizconfig.so is linked against libX11.so. * Source - The tarball in your srpm was not found on the URL written as source0. * Please refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL , section "Using Revision Control" * Also, if this tarball is a "pre-release", please also check the section "Non-Numeric Version in Release" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review