https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1794882 leigh scott <leigh123linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |leigh123linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | |m Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from leigh scott <leigh123linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Approved. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "GPL (v2 or later)", "*No copyright* GPL (v2 or later)". 86 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/leigh/Desktop/1794882-bubblemail/licensecheck.txt [-]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/python3.8/site- packages/bubblemail(Failed, locale,, to, set, C, defaulting), /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/bubblemail/__pycache__(Failed, locale,, to, set, C, defaulting), /usr/lib/python3.8/site- packages/bubblemail/plugins(Failed, locale,, to, set, C, defaulting), /usr/lib/python3.8/site- packages/bubblemail/plugins/__pycache__(Failed, locale,, to, set, C, defaulting), /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/bubblemail/ui(Failed, locale,, to, set, C, defaulting), /usr/lib/python3.8/site- packages/bubblemail/ui/__pycache__(Failed, locale,, to, set, C, defaulting), /usr/share/bubblemail(Failed, locale,, to, set, C, defaulting), /usr/share/bubblemail/avatars(Failed, locale,, to, set, C, defaulting), /usr/share/doc/bubblemail(Failed, locale,, to, set, C, defaulting), /usr/share/licenses/bubblemail(Failed, locale,, to, set, C, defaulting) [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: The spec file handles locales properly. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [?]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 4 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop-file-validate if there is such a file. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [?]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [?]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [?]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [?]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see attached diff). See: (this test has no URL) @@ -44,9 +44,7 @@ %prep %autosetup -p1 -n %{name}-v%{version} -sed -i '1{\@^#!/usr/bin/env python@d}' \ - bubblemail/plugins/spamfilterplugin.py \ - bubblemail/plugins/userscriptplugin.py +sed -i '1{\@^#!/usr/bin/env python@d}' bubblemail/plugins/spamfilterplugin.py bubblemail/plugins/userscriptplugin.py %build %py3_build [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Rpmlint ------- Checking: bubblemail-0.4-1.fc32.x86_64.rpm bubblemail-debuginfo-0.4-1.fc32.x86_64.rpm bubblemail-debugsource-0.4-1.fc32.x86_64.rpm bubblemail-0.4-1.fc32.src.rpm bubblemail.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libsecret bubblemail.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US imap -> imp, map, imam bubblemail.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libnotify -> lib notify, lib-notify, notify bubblemail.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US frontend -> fronted, front end, front-end bubblemail.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US frontends -> front ends, front-ends, fronds bubblemail.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/autostart/bubblemaild.desktop bubblemail.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bubblemail bubblemail.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bubblemail-avatar-provider bubblemail.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bubblemaild bubblemail.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US imap -> imp, map, imam bubblemail.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libnotify -> lib notify, lib-notify, notify bubblemail.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US frontend -> fronted, front end, front-end bubblemail.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US frontends -> front ends, front-ends, fronds 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 12 warnings. Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: bubblemail-debuginfo-0.4-1.fc32.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = (unset), LC_ALL = (unset), LC_CTYPE = "C.UTF-8", LANG = "en_GB.UTF-8" are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C"). perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = (unset), LC_ALL = (unset), LC_CTYPE = "C.UTF-8", LANG = "en_GB.UTF-8" are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C"). bubblemail.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libsecret bubblemail.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US imap -> imp, map, imam bubblemail.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libnotify -> lib notify, lib-notify, notify bubblemail.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US frontend -> fronted, front end, front-end bubblemail.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US frontends -> front ends, front-ends, fronds bubblemail.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: http://bubblemail.free.fr/ <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> bubblemail.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/autostart/bubblemaild.desktop bubblemail.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bubblemail bubblemail.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bubblemail-avatar-provider bubblemail.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bubblemaild bubblemail-debugsource.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: http://bubblemail.free.fr/ <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> bubblemail-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: http://bubblemail.free.fr/ <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 11 warnings. Source checksums ---------------- https://framagit.org/razer/bubblemail/-/archive/v0.4/bubblemail-v0.4.tar.bz2 : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : a62c54d8bafd50117a393effe457f0a044ca9b3b77d25551ee20e38239222e3d CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : a62c54d8bafd50117a393effe457f0a044ca9b3b77d25551ee20e38239222e3d Requires -------- bubblemail (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/python3 folks gnome-keyring hicolor-icon-theme libc.so.6()(64bit) libfolks.so.25()(64bit) libgee-0.8.so.2()(64bit) libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libsecret python(abi) python3 python3-dbus python3-gobject python3-gstreamer1 python3-pyxdg python3-requests rtld(GNU_HASH) bubblemail-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): bubblemail-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- bubblemail: application() application(bubblemail.desktop) bubblemail bubblemail(x86-64) metainfo() metainfo(bubblemail.appdata.xml) python3.8dist(bubblemail) python3dist(bubblemail) bubblemail-debuginfo: bubblemail-debuginfo bubblemail-debuginfo(x86-64) debuginfo(build-id) bubblemail-debugsource: bubblemail-debugsource bubblemail-debugsource(x86-64) Diff spec file in url and in SRPM --------------------------------- --- /home/leigh/Desktop/1794882-bubblemail/srpm/bubblemail.spec 2020-01-25 08:02:10.712197022 +0000 +++ /home/leigh/Desktop/1794882-bubblemail/srpm-unpacked/bubblemail.spec 2020-01-25 01:58:35.000000000 +0000 @@ -45,7 +45,5 @@ %prep %autosetup -p1 -n %{name}-v%{version} -sed -i '1{\@^#!/usr/bin/env python@d}' \ - bubblemail/plugins/spamfilterplugin.py \ - bubblemail/plugins/userscriptplugin.py +sed -i '1{\@^#!/usr/bin/env python@d}' bubblemail/plugins/spamfilterplugin.py bubblemail/plugins/userscriptplugin.py %build Generated by fedora-review 0.7.4 (54fa030) last change: 2019-12-07 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-32-x86_64 -b 1794882 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, Python Disabled plugins: C/C++, Java, Perl, R, SugarActivity, Ocaml, fonts, Haskell, PHP Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
