https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780823 --- Comment #5 from Shlomi Fish <shlomif@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #4) > - Just use: > > %package devel > > - Why did you make the headers noarch? The link I sent you explicitly says > the opposite: > > Do not use noarch > > It may be tempting to make the header library package noarch, since the > header files themselves are simply text. However, a library should have > tests which should be run on all architectures. Also, the install process > may modify the installed headers depending on the build architecture. For > these reasons, header-only packages must not be marked noarch. > > > - Also why not name it rinutils instead of librinutils? Using lib- prefix > is a Debianesque way of doing. Fixed here: * https://www.shlomifish.org/Files/files/code/rinutils.spec * https://www.shlomifish.org/Files/files/arcs/rinutils-0.1.4-1.fc32.src.rpm Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
