https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780885 Kevin Kofler <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Kevin Kofler <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (Not a formal review, just an observation:) Your subpackage naming looks very much OpenSUSE-, Mandriva/Mageia-, or Debian-style to me. In Fedora, we do not usually name library packages with lib*%{_sonum}. We use lib* naming only where it is part of the upstream name, and we only use version suffixes for non-default compatibility versions (and we use the human-readable version number rather than the soversion, though in this case the soversion 2 matches the human-readable major version). More idiomatic Fedora subpackage naming would be something like: %package plugin-authentication (i.e., a cutelyst-plugin-authentication subpackage) etc. It is also not clear to me whether we really need all those subpackages, but maybe we do. That is up to you to decide. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
