https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770566 --- Comment #5 from Dusty Mabe <dustymabe@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #4) > Have you considered using "go2rpm" to generate this spec file? It produces > Go packaging that is compliant with current packaging guidelines? wow! go2rpm is freaking awesome. Lars has been building this package in copr for over a year. I don't think go2rpm existed then. Lars I just tried this out. Here is what I did: I installed go2rpm and ran it with using the following commands: ``` $ sudo dnf install /usr/bin/go2rpm $ mkdir go2rpm && cd go2rpm $ go2rpm github.com/tomnomnom/gron -v 0.6.0 ``` That creates a `golang-github-tomnomnom-gron.spec` that can be used to build an rpm. We probably want to tweak it slighty to make a subpackage named `gron` so people can `dnf install gron`. Here's a diff I applied to get that: ``` @@ -29,6 +29,12 @@ %description %{common_description} +%package -n gron +Summary: %{summary} + +%description -n gron +%{common_description} + %gopkg %prep @@ -47,7 +53,7 @@ %gocheck %endif -%files +%files -n gron %license LICENSE %doc docs CHANGELOG.mkd README.mkd %{_bindir}/* ``` -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
