[Bug 1770582] Review Request: jLEMS - Java Interpreter for the Low Entropy Model Specification language

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770582



--- Comment #6 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> ---
I get that, but this is specialist software---not general software for anyone
to use. Most people will not just try "sudo dnf install jlems". They will be
aware that it is "jLEMS" that they are looking for, matching the upstream name.

In the case of PyLEM alsoS, it matches the pip command that people will be used
to: `pip install PyLEMS`: https://pypi.org/project/PyLEMS/

Even in literature, this is referred to as LEMS, not lems:
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fninf.2014.00079/full

So, here I argue that LEMS is better known by the target audience than lems.


In general can I not also just add Provides: jlems so that both cases are taken
care of?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux