https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773467 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(lnie@xxxxxxxxxx) --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Here is another issue raised by fedora-review which should be fixed (along with the things above) before I continue with the review: - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. Note: License file LICENSE is not marked as %license See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text Instead of %doc README.rst LICENSE use: %doc README.rst %license LICENSE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
