https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764813 --- Comment #10 from Dridi Boukelmoune <dridi.boukelmoune@xxxxxxxxx> --- Apologies for being late to the game but I have some remarks. We should avoid listing %{_libdir}/*.so.* as this might lead to unattended sonames bumps. Also as per the guidelines I think we should follow upstream (sub)packaging as prior art: - apt-libs: split into libapt-pkg and libapt-inst - libapt-pkg: make it provide libapt-pkg%{soname} - libapt-inst: make it provide libapt-inst%{soname} - apt-devel: rename to libapt-pkg-devel - apt-devel-doc: rename to libapt-pkg-doc I'm very much in favor of not having the dummy apt-transport-https package at all, and only provide it in the main apt package. See the upstream source package for reference: https://packages.debian.org/source/buster/apt Other than that, thanks for taking care of the re-review process! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
