Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-10-07 03:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #2) > > > You should beware that livna already has a package named "unrar", and I would > > urge you to at least let them know that you plan to add a package with the same > > name. It has a much higher version number so I expect there to be some level of > > user confusion. > > For this issue, how do you think about making this (Fedora's) new > unrar have "Epoch 1"? Using an Epoch seems like a big kludge. :| If we can get the Livna and Fedora maintainers cooperating about naming/versioning, we can skip the Epoch necessity altogether. Not sure how feasible such cooperation would be though, from a technical standpoint... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review