https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765727 --- Comment #2 from Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Gerald Cox from comment #1) > - Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. > Could the using the %dir directive resolve this? > See: > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30067649/rpmbuild-common-ownership-of- > directories I don't know what rpmlint is talking about here. If you look at the spec file, you can see in %files that everything owned by this package, and its -doc subpackage, is contained in /usr/lib/gap/pkg/circle-%{version}. So no, this package does not own any files or directories owned by other packages. It looks like rpmlint went bonkers on this check for some reason. > - incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/gap-pkg-circle/COPYING > In all cases, upstream SHOULD be informed about this. > This is the only requirement with respect to this error. Sadly, this is almost universally the case in the GAP ecosystem. I need to go on a crusade and get the GAP community to update all of these ancient license files. I will inform upstream. > - only-non-binary-in-usr-lib - invalid warning > See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436500 Right, I will filter that out with an rpmlintrc file. Thank you for the review, Gerald. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
