https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767252 --- Comment #5 from Gerald Cox <gbcox@xxxxxx> --- SPEC URL: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Qt2CHrvU_TuQTKoJtabxIV1C4UGwx5Nm/view?usp=sharing SRPM URL: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-Jod5RYV8rFGp1Cnni4axsxxnUvVrNUN/view?usp=sharing Fedora Account System Username: gbcox COPR URL: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/gbcox/package_reviews/build/1082797/ Thanks for all your recommendations and suggestions. They have all been implemented. Regarding: %license LICENSE.md %{_pkgdocdir}/LICENSE.md I don't see the point of packaging that file twice. for some reason, the %license alone would throw a "not packaged" error. I found that _pkgdocdir alone is sufficient, so I removed the %license. If you have an idea of what might be happening, let me know. Otherwise I'll submit a bug report on it. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
