Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladcca - Linux Audio Developer's Configuration and Connection API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=320661 kwizart@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: ladcca - |Review Request: ladcca - |LAD Configuration and |Linux Audio Developer's |Connection API (LADCCA) |Configuration and Connection | |API ------- Additional Comments From kwizart@xxxxxxxxx 2007-10-06 07:42 EST ------- Oups! ok! rebased on ccrma spec. I have a problem with this directory: %{_datadir}/dtds which package is supposed to own it ? I expect this is relevant to use it instead of %{_datadir}/ladcca/dtds, but i cannot produce rational for this... (it seems not specially hardcoded within the code, or didn't find it...) About /etc/services, I don't know if it is still required with Patch2 added... Currently /etc/services isn't modified by ccrma package. Anyway having this in post will lead to problems with selinux as I expect. A deeper look at the code seems to show that e2fsprogs in only used in config.guess... This doesn't seem relevant to add it. (only libuuid is searched in configure.ac) Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/ladcca/ladcca.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/ladcca/ladcca-0.4.0- 3.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: Linux Audio Developer's Configuration and Connection API -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review