https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764175 --- Comment #3 from Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> --- The upstream tarball (https://github.com/degauden/Elements/archive/5.8.tar.gz) has md5sum 356a85aafbd37b0e39783ad4336b640a79b10a53377ab9cf5ccb5e972ff17c07. The tarball included in your source RPM has md5sum b7b2d861320b61d2fb7ae0f8a9d7cedd9899803e17af668a877444912c467d46. The Source tag must refer to a tarball that matches the one in the package. If you have altered the upstream sources because upstream uses prohibited code, then please follow the guidelines here: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/SourceURL/#when-upstream-uses-prohibited-code. Otherwise, please explain why the source tarballs differ. This package creates libraries that do not have sonames. Please talk to upstream about that. See https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_downstream_so_name_versioning Use either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, not both. See https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_using_buildroot_and_optflags_vs_rpm_build_root_and_rpm_opt_flags The source files have the "any later version" language, so I believe the license should be LGPLv3+, not LGPLv3. Something is going wrong generating the documentation. From the build log: error: Fatal error at line 1 column 1: unexpected end of file error: Fatal error at line 1 column 1: error while parsing prolog Also this. Perhaps building PDF documentation should be disabled? sh: latex: command not found error: Problems running latex. Check your installation or look for typos in _formulas.tex and check _formulas.log! sh: dvips: command not found error: Problems running dvips. Check your installation! Remove all Group tags and the %clean section: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_tags_and_sections There is a comment explaining Patch0. Please add a comment for Patch1. See https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_all_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment Remove this line. The dependency on python3 is automatically generated: Requires: python3 Remove these lines. They are not needed in Fedora: Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig Also remove the %post and %postun scripts. See https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_shared_libraries In %description, write "A C++ based" instead of "A C++ base". Change the Requires in the devel package to these: Requires: cmake-filesystem Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} The devel package does not need cmake itself, just the directories where the cmake files are stored. The addition of %{?_isa} on the second one is explained here: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_architecture_specific_dependencies The doc subpackage should not have "Requires: %{name}-devel", as you do not need headers installed to read documentation. In fact, it should probably have no Requires at all, in spite of what rpmlint has to say on the matter. Consider replacing the body of %prep with "%autosetup -p1 -c %{name}-%{version}". See https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_autosetup Remove this line from all %files sections: %defattr(-,root,root,-) See https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_file_permissions Do you really need all of those %changelog entries? This package has not been in Fedora, so this is history for some other project, probably not of interest to Fedora. I suggest having a single %changelog entry, with something short like "Initial RPM". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
