https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765322 Artem <ego.cordatus@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |POST CC| |ego.cordatus@xxxxxxxxx Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |ego.cordatus@xxxxxxxxx QA Contact|extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |ego.cordatus@xxxxxxxxx Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Artem <ego.cordatus@xxxxxxxxx> --- Felix, LGTM to me. Just a few tiny things: - Linter warned about sources hash sum and spec file differ in RHBZ and SRPM. - The one new thing i learned just yesterday from @churchyard :) %{python3_sitelib}/%{srcname}-%{version}-py?.?.egg-info/ to %{python3_sitelib}/%{srcname}-%{version}-py%{python3_version}.egg-info/ Because: > The ?.? glob would break with Python 3.10. Please fix this minor issues before import. --- Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Note: Upstream MD5sum check error, diff is in /mnt/data- linux/tmp/1765322-python-cssselect2/diff.txt See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/SourceURL/ ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License", "*No copyright* BSD (unspecified)", "BSD (unspecified)". 23 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /mnt/data-linux/tmp/1765322-python-cssselect2/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/python3.8/site- packages/cssselect2(C, Failed, locale,, to, defaulting, set), /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/cssselect2-0.2.2-py3.8.egg-info(C, Failed, locale,, to, defaulting, set), /usr/lib/python3.8/site- packages/cssselect2/__pycache__(C, Failed, locale,, to, defaulting, set), /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/cssselect2/tests(C, Failed, locale,, to, defaulting, set), /usr/lib/python3.8/site- packages/cssselect2/tests/__pycache__(C, Failed, locale,, to, defaulting, set), /usr/share/doc/python3-cssselect2(C, Failed, locale,, to, defaulting, set), /usr/share/licenses/python3-cssselect2(C, Failed, locale,, to, defaulting, set) [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [x]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Note: Bad spec filename: /mnt/data-linux/tmp/1765322-python- cssselect2/srpm-unpacked/python-cssselect2.spec See: (this test has no URL) [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). Rpmlint ------- Checking: python3-cssselect2-0.2.2-1.fc32.noarch.rpm python-cssselect2-0.2.2-1.fc32.src.rpm python3-cssselect2.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US parsers -> parser, parses, parers python3-cssselect2.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cElementTree -> entrancement python3-cssselect2.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lxml -> XML python-cssselect2.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US parsers -> parser, parses, parers python-cssselect2.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cElementTree -> entrancement python-cssselect2.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lxml -> XML 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = (unset), LC_ALL = (unset), LC_CTYPE = "C.UTF-8", LANG = "ru_UA.UTF-8" are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C"). perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = (unset), LC_ALL = (unset), LC_CTYPE = "C.UTF-8", LANG = "ru_UA.UTF-8" are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C"). python3-cssselect2.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US parsers -> parser, parses, parers python3-cssselect2.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cElementTree -> entrancement python3-cssselect2.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lxml -> XML 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/Kozea/cssselect2/archive/0.2.2/cssselect2-0.2.2.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 70485a680cd72b023f0ce5ae4dcd392e2b10f7280e20afdb1735334bd6af7e6a CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 83d14b8e6810717d58c7165601e1af0455994baeaf9ea03dfa6aca07791c39f5 diff -r also reports differences Requires -------- python3-cssselect2 (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/sh python(abi) python3-tinycss2 python3-webencodings python3.8dist(tinycss2) Provides -------- python3-cssselect2: python-cssselect2 python3-cssselect2 python3.8dist(cssselect2) python3dist(cssselect2) Generated by fedora-review 0.7.3 (44b83c7) last change: 2019-09-18 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1765322 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, Python Disabled plugins: C/C++, fonts, R, SugarActivity, Perl, PHP, Ocaml, Haskell, Java Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
