https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763931 --- Comment #14 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Sergio Monteiro Basto from comment #13) > I think you misunderstood me , this is for review, is not a final version. I > already changed sources.list, I can do sub-packaging and doc packages. I > honestly don't want ship any non-released version is not my goal in "deb > tools project". You have to look how are the evolution of the other packages > , for example dpkg (which I owned) is not updated , I need updated it > urgently, is version 1.18.25, is not 1.19.7 but epel 7 haven't minimums > required for version 1.19.x Is there anything other than GnuTLS that isn't satisfied in EPEL7? > I just try to help , you may do whatever you like , I already have a > apt-1.8.4 working which is useful for my work, no worries. > APT 1.9.4 shipped with Ubuntu 19.10, so I consider that sufficiently stable. Also, as a matter of course, I think it makes sense to follow the latest released versions of software as our policy dictates, provided they can be built and installed in Fedora. This also makes it so that we can handle supporting building packages that necessitate transitions from Debian, for example when Debian and Ubuntu switched from gzip to xz in mid 2018. They're debating a similar change again, this time to zstd. And build-side changes such as updates to debhelper and the set of dh_* scripts are relevant for building packages complying with the latest standards of the Debian Policy. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
