https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761576 --- Comment #3 from Qianqian Fang <fangqq@xxxxxxxxx> --- > - Do you really need to provide static libraries? There are usually not provided in Fedora. I personally like linking with static libraries because it makes the software more portable. So, if possible, I would like to provide the .a >- Use install -p to keep timestamps Got it >- To avoid unintentional soname bump, we forbid globbing the major soname version, be more specific instead: >%{_libdir}/lib%{name}.so.* Can you clarify this a little bit? Did you mean I should replace lib%{name}.so with libzmat.so? Or I must name this library to something else? Does this also apply to the .a file as well? Let me know, I can update the spec file. >- Probably need to delete that: pwd ls easylzma-0.0.8/include/ Yes, those were for debugging purposes > - I see the GPL license file, but where does the or BSD come from? I placed the code under dual license of gpl and bsd. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
