https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759940 --- Comment #12 from Jun Aruga <jaruga@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Hi John Thanks for your feedback! > In particular Fedora should provide a fully-featured HTSlib build by > configuring with > > ./configure --enable-plugins > --with-plugin-path='/usr/local/libexec/htslib:$(plugindir)' --enable-libcurl > --enable-gcs --enable-s3 You are right. Let me change the spec file later. > The file format man pages (sam.5 etc) are aimed at users of tools eg > samtools, not only at developers using the API. So IMHO they would fit > better in the htslib-tools subpackage alongside the other manual pages. Yeah, the man pages are for user's document. These are main document. I feel it might be better place than htslib-devel. How other foolib packages dealing with it? Later I need to check it. ``` %{_mandir}/man5/faidx.5* %{_mandir}/man5/sam.5* %{_mandir}/man5/vcf.5* ``` -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
