https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760617 --- Comment #3 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> --- Can you please provide the "raw" link to the spec file please? The fedora-review tool cannot work with the link in the current form since it returns HTML, not the raw spec file. (In reply to Qianqian Fang from comment #2) > In this package, I also moved the .mex file to /usr/libexec (if this is the > right place), and create a link in the toolbox folder. I will do the same > for octave-zmat/octave-mcxlab. I don't think mex files need to be moved. You simply put these files (along with other arch specific files) into %{octpkglibdir} which expands to %{_libdir}/octave/packages/.. %{octpkglibdir} should be known to octave too, so nothing else should be needed here. libexec was a special case because the package bundled binaries. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
