https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757675 --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #5) > (In reply to Lubomir Rintel from comment #4) > > (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #3) > > > - Don't own %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor, instead Requires: hicolor-icon-theme > > > and be more specific: > > > > > > Requires: hicolor-icon-theme > > > > > > […] > > > > > > %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*/apps/*.svg > > > > I don't think this is necessary. calls app doesn't require anything that > > hicolor-icon-theme package ships and will do just fine without it. > > > > This is necessary, you don't own a directory already owned by another > package, you depend on it. I have to respectfully disagree. The directory is not owned just by the hicolor-icon-theme package It happens to need it in place and so do I. RPM allows two packages to ship the same directory specifically for this. This is a common practice. That is also what the packaging guidelines suggest: Please also note that it is not uncommon for multiple packages to provide the same directory. [1] [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_file_and_directory_dependencies -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
